 |
|
|
    
|
| |
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: Baggs M1/PUTW #54 Combination - Open Mic Report
|
Gerry Member
|
posted 05-13-2004 05:56 AM
I've had this in the guitar for a few days now. The tech had some trouble installing the #54 as there wasn't enough room beside the treble brace to completely place the treble pickup on the soundboard. As a result, part of the pickup touches an adjoining brace. In short, I don't have the optimal placement for the pickup so keep that in mind.I had my tech install the M1 and #54 on the ring and tip of the supplied stereo endpin jack. I also got a Power Plug that can send out either a summed mono signal or a stereo signal. The tech only had an electric guitar amp so that's all I was able to test it through and the combination sounded better than the #54 by itself. Still, that wasn't a fair way to judge the pickups. Unfortunately, I don't have an acoustic amp myself so I couldn't do any testing at home. I played the guitar at an open mic tonight and although the sound was ok, it still wasn't that great. Strangely enough, the #54 signal by itself sounded better here. The combination sounded a little distorted to my ears. Although it was going through a great amp (AER Alpha), I still don't think it was a great place to evaluate the pickups because I wasn't able to blend them and experiment. I will be heading to the local acoustic guitar shop to try out a bunch of acoustic amps and that should give me a better idea. I have a stereo Y cable so I'll be able to feed pickup signals separately into the channels of the various amps (AER, Marshall, Ashdown). I'll post another report then. The way I see it, my options are to: a) replace the Power Plug with a Stereo Blender from PUTW and blend the signals b) take out the #54 and just use the M1 through a PADI If I can blend the signals well at the music shop, I'll probably go with a). If not, then b) All that might change on Saturday after I go down to the shop, though  |
Gary Hall Member
|
posted 05-13-2004 12:40 PM
Thanks for the report, Gerry.The experiment with passively blending the M1 and #54 signals (before preamping) was a long shot, but I give you credit for giving it a try. I suspect that you'll be more pleased with blending the M1 and #54 signals *after* each signal has been individually preamped. I suspect that the tone controls, on the amps that you'll be trying out, will be helpful in getting the tone that you're after. Also, if there's a phase inversion switch on one of the signal channels, you'll want to try both switch positions to see which results in the best sounding blend. Good luck with your amp/pickup testing. I'm looking forward to reading about your further adventures in acoustic guitar amplification. Gary Hall |
Gerry Member
|
posted 05-13-2004 02:48 PM
Hi Gary, Yeah, I guess it was always going to be a long shot but hey, you gotta try, right? I think you're right about the blend after the signals have been preamped. I'm sure the system has the potential to be a good one and I need to find the way to do that. I'll post after I try out the acoustic amps.Gerry |
Gerry Member
|
posted 05-14-2004 08:21 PM
Ok, I went to the shop and tried out a couple of amps, an Ashdown AAR1 (100 Watts) and an AER compact 60 (60 Watts). I had a stereo Y cable with each mono output plugged into a different channel of the amp. The pickups don't sound bad at all. Individually, the Baggs M1 sounded a little bit electric on the high strings (in the AER) and the #54 sounded nice but tended to feedback at too high a volume. My tech's recommendation was a blend of 80% Baggs and 20% PUTW for some warmth and I think that was the best sound.The Ashdown suited the guitar more, to my ears. It had a warmer sound, and one which I preferred for what I play. It looks like for now, I'll get the Stereo Blender from PUTW. |
Gary Hall Member
|
posted 05-15-2004 07:07 AM
Thanks for the follow-up, Gerry. It looks like you've found a winning combination. You'll want to experiment with different blends for different performance settings. (ie. Try more #54 for the quieter settings and more M1 when industrial-strength gain is needed.)Thanks again, Gary |
tim farney Member
|
posted 05-15-2004 05:38 PM
This is what drives me to distraction about pickup systems -- preamp each pickup separately before going to the amp? AHHHHHH!!!! I'm a guitar player. If I wanted to be an engineer, that's what I'd do!!!OK. Got that out of my system. I feel better now. How does the M1 sound if you just plug it into the PA and play? Tim |
Gerry Member
|
posted 05-16-2004 01:12 AM
quote: Originally posted by tim farney: How does the M1 sound if you just plug it into the PA and play?Tim
I know EXACTLY how you feel, Tim! At the open mic, the M1 went into an AER Alpha and that was fed into a PA. It sounded good but the high E and B strings sounded a little electric. I'm swapping the Power Plug for a the Stereo Blender from David Enke (so I can have either each pickup individually or a blend of both) and then I'm done with pickups. For now, since the summed combination doesn't sound all that great, I'll just take a Y cable with me so I can use the pickups individually. Gerry |
fingerpick Member
|
posted 05-16-2004 02:02 PM
Just finished a preliminary video and look at the Baggs M-1 in the Guitar Pickups section of Fingerpick Magazine. There is also a look at the Sunrise from a few weeks ago. Both of these pickups can sound pretty acoustic for performances but I think you may have more luck with your sound if you use some very light effects in combo like reverb, delay and stereo or quad chorus. Also most pickups do better if you lose a lot of the midrange with your eq. Finally Rick Turner and Duncan (DTAR) make the Solstice Preamp that has two input channels both (2) XLR and (2) 1/4" that will blend all of your stuff together in one box. 3 Band Eq, effect loop and dead quiet. I use a Digitech Artist 2120 tube preamp in the video to get the near acoustic sound you will hear but the effects such as a good spatial chorus and delay/verb should not be overlooked to "reproduce" better acoustic sound from pickup systems. the link for the video is: http://www.andromedan.com/movies/baggs1.wmv for Macs: http://www.andromedan.com/movies/baggs1.mpg More to come Doug [This message has been edited by fingerpick (edited 05-16-2004).] |
Gerry Member
|
posted 05-16-2004 03:10 PM
Hi Doug, Thanks for that. I'm a total newbie when it comes to electronic stuff - overwhelmed by the option. The pickup sounds fantastic in your demo!I look forward to reading your review. The Sunrise review was pretty good. I'm hesitant about getting the Solstice mainly because of portability issues in terms of size and also how it's non battery-powered. I'm in Australia and currently, I'm playing at a weekly open mic where you turn up, plug in and play. I like the PUTW Power Blender because I can adjust the mix from my guitar, it's battery powered and it will send a mono signal out. I know that I'll give up any eq-ing from there but for my current needs and this context, I think it should work. I'll head down to the music shop again this weekend and try experimenting with the eq on the amps. I'm not expecting the pickup to exactly reproduce the sound of the guitar but if I can get the sound you got from the M1 in the demo, I'll be extremely happy and completely satisfied. Thanks for the tips, Doug, and showing me what's possible. [This message has been edited by Gerry (edited 05-16-2004).] |
matthewb Member
|
posted 05-17-2004 06:40 AM
quote: Originally posted by fingerpick:
I use a Digitech Artist 2120 tube preamp in the video to get the near acoustic sound you will hear but the effects such as a good spatial chorus and delay/verb should not be overlooked to "reproduce" better acoustic sound from pickup systems.
OK, that was the best sounding demo of the M1 I have ever heard. Would you care to elaborate on exactly how that was recorded? Matt |
fingerpick Member
|
posted 05-17-2004 08:14 PM
Thanks Gerry and Matt,I do and will go into much more specific detail at Fingerpick Mag, but in general the use of effects, which can spread out the time and position the sound arrives in the spectrum. Much like the sound you hear when playing an acoustic that comes from many different locations and surfaces of the instrument. The quad chorus, reverbs, and delays I used in the Digitech box have a nearly infinite number of timing and spatial orientations. Used subtley this gives one the impression of space and retards attack. to varying degrees much like an acoustic box. The rackmount Digitech Valve (tube)2120 Artist I used is no longer in production but they are sending us one that has similar effects modules so we can experiment with a unit that others can get. The new ones area lot less expensive too. Most pickups sample small areas of the instrument, the mag being a single point source though greatly improved with the body sensing capabilities of the M1 and even the Sunrise. The point being, the attack and release with pickups is much more immediate and uniform than a miked acoustic. USTs are pretty immediate as well and sample a relatively small part of the instrument. ST's sample more but can be prone to feedback at realistic, larger room or louder performance volume levels. All can be helped dramatically by EQ and effect enhancment by the purchase of a 2-3 hundred dollar multi-effect preamp. Losing some midrange (250 Hz to 1Khz) and boosting highs perhaps a little and lows quite a bit helps and is important especially in a mag and even in a UST. Your graphic EQ looks like a smile. And the sound you hear in the video would be even more acoustically enhanced when using speakers with wide dispersion horns - ie PA's rather than most guitar amps. In other words the sound you hear in the video would be even more dramatic through proper sound reinforcement. Recording is almost always the worst case scenario (except for feedback) for acoustic pickups. Try your guitar and pickup with some multi-effect preamps, looking at those that have multiple channel choruses with spatial and timing adjustments, as well as reverbs and delays with similar control of these parameters. Subtle use of these kinds of tools can make dramatic improvements in your "acoustic" sound. There were probably 100 parameter selection/tweaks in setting up the Digitech for the M1 recording. Took about 15 minutes but I only had to do it once because I saved the patch. More to come Doug
[This message has been edited by fingerpick (edited 05-17-2004).] |
matthewb Member
|
posted 05-18-2004 06:18 AM
Thanks, Doug. I also found your Fingerpick Mag site in the interim and read over what you had there. Very helpful! Do you know what model Digitech is sending you now? I don't know of any acoustic specific Digitech preamps. Is it also a tube preamp? I have to say I liked your sound enough to at least consider the extra cost and effort to set up an M1 rig. Is anyone else getting this kind of sound out of the M1 live? If so, what are you using? Sidheguitarist? Sweet Tyrone? Matt |
tedzepplin Member
|
posted 05-18-2004 08:15 AM
Thanks doug. Sounds incredible! |
Brad166 Member
|
posted 05-18-2004 10:29 AM
What song is that your playing in the video????????????????????????????????? |
Gary Hall Member
|
posted 05-18-2004 11:06 AM
Matthew,I've done a little recording of the M1, using just the Baggs PADI preamp for some tone shaping and gain. I didn't come anywhere close to Doug's lovely tone, although the M1 *is* definitely the best sounding mag pickup that I've tried. I'd guess that Sidheguitarist, with his Demeter Tube DI, or Takamine's Mike Markure, with his "Cool Tube" preamp, are getting closer to Doug's results. Doug,
In case you're not aware of it, I believe that your last name is spelled wrong in the video's streaming subtitle. FWIW, I like the M1 recording better (sound-wise) than the Sunrise recording. In fact, the M1 recording is *so* good that I wouldn't mind buying the extra gear and educating myself on the effects tweaks - if only the M1 was compatable with all of my playing styles. Its obviously a great pickup for some folks. Gary Hall |
Contact Us | Acoustic Guitar Central
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c
|
|
|
|
|
|