MIGUEL 12-STRINGS | BOLT-ON VS. DOVETAIL | TWO PARTS IN ONE

Send Us a Question

Miguel 12-Strings

Q I have heard that folksingers Fred Neil and Bob Gibson played 12-string guitars made by Miguel Company. I collect early boutique luthier guitars but haven't been able to find any information about these instruments. What can you tell me?

Ben Cooney
Sunnyvale, California

A Before coming to the US in the early 1960s, Miguel Company was chief luthier for the Cuban National Folk Orchestra. He made not only guitars but other traditional stringed instruments and did repairs and restorations as well. By the time he was making 12-string guitars in his little shop in Coral Gables, Florida, just south of Miami, he was probably in his late 70s or early 80s. It's doubtful he made more than 100 or so 12-strings. James Durst writes about the highest-numbered one I know of in his story "Searching for #77," which appears in Bruce Pollock's book Working Musicians. But 12-strings were not just an afterthought for Miguelalong with the year and the number of each guitar, the professionally printed labels he placed in every one of his guitars included the "Spanglish" inscription "Specialized on twelve strings." As a musician in Miami in the '60s, I saw more than a few of themNigel Pickering of Spanky and Our Gang was another south Florida musician who played one. In south Florida, with its large Cuban and Cuban-American population, there is high demand for anything made by a Cuban master guitar builder, and about ten years ago a Cuban-American guitar appraiser examined my 1966 Miguel (#54) and estimated its value at $8,000—$10,000.

—Marvin Langsam

Return to Top


Miguel Company 12-string.

Bolt-on vs. Dovetail

Q There's a lot of debate about bolt-on necks versus traditional dovetail joints. What are the relative merits of each?

Tony Claar
Chapel Hill, North Carolina

A When I first started in lutherie, more than 30 years ago, it was commonly held that necks needed to be reset only on really old instruments and/or poorly built ones. But virtually all steel-string guitars, including lightly built archtops, eventually undergo body shape changes that result in a neck-angle problem, and today we accept that it's only a matter of time before any flattop guitar will need to have its neck removed and reset as close as possible to the original angle with respect to the top and the bridge. In fact, many will need that job repeated at regular intervals. With that in mind, why not go with the flow and make a guitar with a neck that can come off with minimal damage to the finish or structure of the instrument?

A glued dovetail neck is removable as long as the glue can be softened reasonably easily. It's the traditional method, but that doesn't make it superior to a bolted mortise. Many people argue that the neck joint contributes to tone—claiming that Taylor guitars sound bright and Martins have a fuller bass response because of their different neck joints—but that's comparing apples and oranges. In the dreadnought size, for example, Taylor instruments have different, heavier top bracing, which makes for a stiffer top that emphasizes treble response, while Martins are more flexible, due to lighter bracing and similar thickness tops and backs, allowing for a fuller bass. From time to time, I've been asked to convert a guitar from a solid "nonremovable" to a bolted neck, and in no case have either I or the owner of the guitar detected a loss of tone.

Classical and flamenco builders, in the interest of playability and tone, often aim for a rather low bridge and saddle height, but that presents nasty challenges for repair as the guitar's action changes over time. I've met a number of angry owners of high-end Spanish classical guitars who were disappointed that their necks couldn't be removed and reset. Thanks to Bob Taylor and other highly regarded makers such as Collings and Huss and Dalton, the stigma of a bolt-on neck is now a thing of the past, so why not let the dovetail be a thing of the past, too?

—Frank Ford

Return to Top

Two Parts in One

Q On the Acoustic Guitar Method, Book 1 CD (String Letter Publishing), it sounds like David Hamburger is playing both the rhythm and lead parts on "Banks of the Ohio." How does he do that?

Philip MacNeill
Providence, Rhode Island

A Hamburger is indeed playing both parts on "Banks of the Ohio," though not at the same time. He overdubbed one part over the other, first recording the rhythm part, then playing that back and recording the lead part on top. There are numerous multitrack recorders, hard-disk devices, and software programs (like ProTools) that allow you to do this. On the CD, the lead parts are panned to the right and the rhythm parts are panned to the left; turn your stereo balance control all the way to the right or left to hear them separately.

—Andrew DuBrock

Return to Top

 

Excerpted from Acoustic Guitar magazine, February 2003, No. 134.

Send Questions, tips, or observations to Acoustic Guitar's online discussion forums at www.acousticguitar.com or write to Q&A, Acoustic Guitar, PO Box 767, San Anselmo, CA 94979-0767.


 Return to Top